Fostering Regional Collaboration Case by Case

Share Button

Richmond City Hall

For reasons rooted in local identity and entrenched political interest, Virginians are unlikely to consolidate their local governments into units aligned with the metropolitan regions they serve. But it is not impossible to imagine governments partnering regionally on specific projects.

A new study by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, “Encouraging Local Collaboration through State Incentives,” describes areas where collaboration might make sense and how the state can encourage it.

K-12 education, which accounted for $13.2 billion in state and local spending in FY 2011, is one area rife with opportunity. For instance, special education programs can be administered more efficiently on a regional basis — reducing the cost per student by $6,500 to $13,500.

Public safety, which accounts for $4 billion in state and local spending, offers more low-hanging fruit. Regional radio networks would facilitate the cost-efficient collaboration between local fire, police and rescue. A step toward even greater integration, which could save localities up to $8 million, would be to create of joint emergency dispatch centers. Building joint courthouses can reduce construction costs by 16% 6o 44%. The cost of managing jail populations could be cut by $65 per person per day by allowing individuals awaiting trial to be transferred from jail detention to less expensive community release.

Other functions include regional administration of foster care, regional operation of public utilities and regional procurement.

The state can encourage regional collaboration by identifying savings to the state — the state contributes heavily toward foster care, special education and local jails, for example — and sharing some of the projected gain with the local governments.

There is nothing sexy about these nuts-and-bolts proposals for efficiency in government. In fact, the details can be pretty boring. You won’t find citizens holding demonstrations at the state Capitol grounds to demand more regional collaboration. (Regional foster care now! Regional foster care now!) But taxpayer advocates and good-government types should find common cause in making government work more effectively.

Email this author

Share Button

About Jim Bacon

James A. Bacon is the author of “Boomergeddon” and publishes the Bacon’s Rebellion blog at www.

This entry was posted in Government Reform, State Government, Top Story. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Fostering Regional Collaboration Case by Case

  1. Gerald A. Fill says:

    Enjoyed reading your editiorial.. What could advance this is a governmental reform initiative by the Governonr made up of local and state officials and advocates. The Governor’s reform commission did not include fundamental reform of the governing structures of local government, and of course the benefits of consolidation/regionalism benefits.

    Back in the 70s in no. va. an organization made up of citizens association repressentatives headed up by Phil Chabot recommended to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors a Charter Review Commission to examine authorities and form of government of Fairfax County, the largest local jurisdication in Virginia. The fairfax county Board of Supervisors rejected the proposal. In fact the unicameral weak mayor system is anachronistic. No jurisdiction of this size has an appointed county executive and unicameral government not only in the washington metro area but nationwide. Regional authorities could be one of the outcomes of a citizens-based Charter Review. Our area is in need of regional authorities in transportation, public safety, and education. The problem is lack of sufficient political incentives for change. At least in part because of the weak mayor system and one party rule that prevails.

Comments are closed.